Tag Archives: coaching

What’s Really Holding Your Team Back? The Confidence–Competence Gap No One Talks About

There’s a look I’ve seen often — that pause after I introduce a new task.

Not resistance. Not laziness.

Just a subtle pause.

Sometimes it’s a look of “Are you sure I can do this?”

Other times it’s a confident “Yep!” — followed by an outcome that quietly says… maybe not.

It took me years (and a few humbling leadership stumbles) to realize that behind every reaction to a task is a quiet dance between confidence and competence. And here’s the kicker: that dance plays out not just in others, but in ourselves too.

We lead people.

We assign things.

We expect initiative.

And sometimes, we walk away from a task handover feeling like: Why didn’t that land the way I thought it would?

When you zoom out, it’s often not about the task. It’s about how people see themselves in relation to it.

Confidence and competence are two different muscles. Some have both. Some have one. Some have neither — yet.


Ken Blanchard’s Situational Leadership Theory offers a timeless truth: effective leaders don’t lead the same way all the time — they adjust based on who they’re leading and what the task demands. Depending on a person’s readiness and skill, we’re called to direct, coach, support, or delegate.

That model has been a compass in my own leadership journey — but over the years, I found myself craving something even more grounded in the lived reality of schools. I started collecting observations — scribbled on post-its during meetings, noted in margins of agendas, shared over hallway check-ins. Real stories. Real reactions.

Over time, a pattern began to emerge. From those small but telling moments, I developed what I now call my Confidence–Competence Lens — a tool that builds on Blanchard’s work, but reflects the heartbeat of real school life. It’s the tool I turn to when deciding not just what needs doing, but how to support the person doing it.

Because leadership isn’t just about assigning tasks — it’s about noticing how people meet them, and knowing what to do next. Here’s how I use the lens to guide both leadership decisions and support strategies:

Competence & Confidence Lens in ActionHigh ConfidenceLow Confidence
High CompetenceEmpower & Trust 
✓ Let them lead key initiatives or mentor others. 
✓ Give stretch goals that build mastery and ownership. 
✓ Involve them in co-creating strategy or vision. 

Watch for: Overcommitment or burnout due to over-reliance.

Say: “I’d love for you to lead this — I trust your judgment and skill.”

Coach Quietly 
✓ Affirm their strengths privately and publicly. 
✓ Give them low-risk opportunities to lead. 
✓ Provide examples of their impact they may not see. 

Watch for: Impostor syndrome, reluctance to speak in groups. 

What people say: “I’m not ready”

Say: “You already have what it takes — let’s find a space where you can try it out without pressure.”
Low CompetenceMonitor Closely 
✓ Pair with a mentor or buddy. 
✓ Break tasks into steps with checkpoints. 
✓ Provide scripts, models, or exemplars. 

Watch for: Missed details, inconsistent follow-through. 

What people say: “Got it!” (but no follow-through)

Say: “Let’s work through the first part together — I’ll check in after Step 2 and help you course-correct if needed.”
Mentor Patiently 
✓ Teach explicitly. Model tasks. Role-play scenarios. 
✓ Normalize learning curve — give space to fail safely. 
✓ Celebrate growth, not just outcomes. 

Watch for: Avoidance, anxiety, or misdirected effort. 

Say: “This will take time — but you don’t have to do it alone. Let’s focus on progress, not perfection.”


Reflection Starts With Us

In the day-to-day pace of leadership, we’re often focused on how our team is reacting — who’s leaning in, who’s hesitant, who’s dragging their heels. But it’s just as important to pause and recognise where our own reactions as leaders show up most strongly.

Is it in our resistance to trying a new system?
Is it that voice in our head saying, “This won’t work for our context,” or “I’m too busy for this”?
Or that burst of enthusiasm for a new idea — followed by quiet procrastination?

We’re not immune to the same gaps we recognize in others. And asking ourselves why we hesitate can be just as important as noticing it in our teams.

Whether we’re assigning a task or facing one ourselves, the same lens applies. This isn’t about judging — it’s about being curious, and matching the right response to the human need, in others and in ourselves.in ourselves.


Leadership isn’t about having all the answers.

It’s about noticing what gets in the way, and doing something about it.

We’ve all been the confident beginner, the quiet expert, the reluctant participant, the over-eager new hire. We’ve all needed someone to say: “I see what you can do. Let me help you get there.”

So the next time a task falls flat or a team member pulls back — Pause.

Ask: “Is it confidence? Competence? Or both?” Then lead with what they need. Because when we grow both confidence and competence — in others and ourselves — we don’t just build better teams. We build braver ones.

From the (Virtual) Room: Instructional Supervision Trends We Can’t Ignore

While most educators were taking a well-earned summer pause, a cohort of school leaders and instructional coaches from across the globe chose something different: to sit in a virtual room, for seven days, to confront the messy, emotional, and often misunderstood world of instructional supervision and evaluation.

I had the privilege of co-facilitating the Instructional Supervision and Evaluation course at the Principals’ Training Center this July, and something about this particular cohort stayed with me. It wasn’t just their commitment—it was the quiet clarity they brought. They didn’t come just to learn a framework. They came with thoughtful problems of practice, patterns they’d been noticing, and a genuine belief that the systems they were leading—or working within—could do better. And more importantly, they came ready to take action.

Common Themes that Emerged : What We’re Really Trying to Fix

One of the things I’ve always appreciated about PTC courses is the emphasis on application tasks—practical, school-based projects or change initiatives that participants design during the week to bring back and implement in their own contexts.

As I reviewed the change initiatives—the diversity of contexts was striking. But what was even more powerful were the common themes that kept showing up, regardless of country, role, or school size —clear signals that leaders across the world are wrestling with similar challenges and reaching toward a more human, meaningful version of instructional supervision.

With over 57 school leaders representing 54 schools across 48 countries, these patterns are more than just coincidence—they suggest emerging global trends in how we think about instructional supervision. In research terms, this may not be a formal sample, but it certainly reflects a meaningful, practitioner-led pulse across international schools.

Here’s what we’re seeing:

  • Humanizing the Process: Leaders are moving away from high-stakes, formal observations toward mini observations and peer feedback—making growth more regular, more relational, and less performative.
  • Trust as a Starting Point: Many named trust as the first thing they need to build—before any framework, rubric, or policy can take root.
  • Alignment to mission and values: More leaders are realizing that when supervision doesn’t reflect school values, student learning outcomes, or professional standards, it feels hollow. Coherence matters.
  • Empowering Teacher Voice: Supervision isn’t one-way. Educators are co-constructing rubrics, initiating peer learning walks, and asking for differentiated pathways to support their growth.
  • Using Data as a Mirror: Student learning data is being reframed—not as accountability pressure, but as a reflective tool to guide professional learning conversations.
  • Anchoring to Professional Standards of Practice: Schools are leaning into international standards of practice for teachers—not to control, but to create clarity, shared language, and purpose.

One participant asked: What if we made supervision feel like support instead of surveillance? That question lingered.

Mindsets That Need Rewriting

As an observer and guide throughout the week, I saw a shared readiness and a collective willingness to move beyond what’s always been done and lean into more intentional, human-centered leadership. The mindset shifts were clear—and they echoed across roles, schools, and regions. Here are a few that surfaced again and again:

  • From evaluator to learning partner: Supervisors are trying to sit beside teachers, not above them.
  • From collecting evidence to creating clarity: There’s growing recognition that teachers need to know what to aim for—not just what not to do.
  • From isolated walkthroughs to relational feedback loops: Supervision, when done right, strengthens the professional culture, not just instructional practice.
  • From telling to asking: More leaders are leaning into coaching, pausing, and listening. And that’s where real trust begins.
  • From pedagogy to learning impact: Supervisors are shifting their lens—not just asking what the teacher is doing, but how and what students are learning as a result. The focus is moving from activity to evidence of learning.
  • From single data points to multiple sources of evidence: Supervisors are moving beyond relying on just one observation or test score to determine teaching effectiveness. Instead, they’re drawing from a range of data—student work, learning conversations, peer feedback, and outcomes over time—to build a fuller, more accurate picture of impact.
  • From top-down control to shared responsibility: Schools are beginning to embed supervision into a distributed leadership model, where growth is not held by one person, but shared across teams. When teachers help shape the system, they’re more invested in the outcomes—and supervision becomes a collective commitment, not just a managerial task.

Patterns I’ll Be Taking With Me

In between toolkits, frameworks, and standards, what struck me most were the unspoken efforts behind each task: the courage to name what’s broken, the willingness to build something new, and the quiet acknowledgment that instructional supervision is emotional labor—both for the teacher and the leader.

Too often, supervision is mistaken for a tool to fix teachers. But what if its real purpose is to free them? Free them from ambiguity. Free them from fear. Free them from feedback that feels more like judgment than growth.

In that sense, every person in our cohort wasn’t just designing a new system. They were trying to write a new story for their school—one where professional growth is seen as a shared act of care.

The Responsibility of Facilitating This Work

Facilitating this course comes with responsibility. It means holding space for hard questions. It means not pushing a one-size-fits-all model, but helping leaders find what works in their context, for their teachers, in service of their students. And it means reminding all of us—myself included—that supervision is not just a checklist we tick off but it’s a culture we build.

Even in the heat of July, there are leaders out there choosing to rethink what growth can look like. Choosing learning. Choosing clarity. Choosing trust.

And honestly? That gives me hope.

What About You?

What will instructional supervision mean in your school next year?

What are you walking past—and what are you walking toward?

Meeting Learners Wherever They May Be

“Aim for the middle of the square,” I encourage an 8-year old boy on my basketball team.

The power of geometry on full display. Meanwhile, another player kicks the ball against the gymnasium wall, seemingly confusing basketball for soccer.  Two others chase each other in a game of tag. Out of the corner of my eye, I spot another dancing the Macarena.  The Macarena?  Is Tik Tok responsible for the one-hit wonder Spanish song of 1993 being brought back? Reaching for my whistle, I notice another player launching shots from beyond the three-point line.  In wonder I look on, taking a few seconds to just take in the full scene.  

Weren’t the directions and demonstration clear?  To take shots from 3 feet away, stepping from side to side and aiming at the middle of the box. A timeless backboard drill.  

Before I am able to blow the whistle, it happens.

“Coach, can you tie my shoe?” one 4-foot tall player earnestly requests.  His large blue eyes match his dyed fringe.  The shrill tone of his voice resembling my 5-year old nephew’s.  

I look down at his knotted lace and caught up in the chaos, regretfully do not seize the opportunity to teach this “life skill.”  On the ride home, the moment continued to be replayed. Impossible to get out of my head, it stewed the next 48 hours.  

For a veteran teacher, this was a serious self-check.  An invaluable lesson to meet the learner, wherever they might be. A cornerstone of any education certification program, I would have guessed I perfected this lesson.  However, in the midst of “herding cats,” did I forget?  Mere negligence? Simply distracted?  Whatever the reason, I was embarrassed for myself.  A “wrong” to made right!  

Grateful to learn from the error, I was reminded how we may have a particular aim for a class or practice, yet of even greater importance than our plan, is that we remain flexible and respond to the learners right before our eyes. Differentiation sometimes a reflex, while at other times requires utmost intention.  

The next practice I approached the boy with the knotted laces and on bended knee showed him how to tie his shoe. Singing in a hushed tone, “Over, under, around and through, meet Mr. Bunny Rabbit, pull and through.”  Smiling, he gave it a try, his motor skills a clear challenge. The third attempt a success!

During my childhood a poster hung in our home’s laundry room.  It shared advice from best-selling author, Robert Fulgum and was titled, “All I Really Need to Know I Learned in Kindergarten.” Fulgum conveyed the simplicity and power of such adages as, share everything, and to play fair. 

Years later, a third grade teacher, I turned to look over my shoulder each time a student called, “Mister…”  I looked for my father, a bit bewildered because from one day to the next I had become a “Mister” myself.  Though the exuberance, joy, and energy of 8 and 9-year olds was a pleasure, middle school became my wheelhouse.  More than twenty years would pass before I would be in the company of third-graders again. 

This time, wearing the hat of coach. A chance to improve my well-conditioned skills in patience but also explicitness, assuming nothing.   

Not even that all the children can yet tie their own shoes.

Mentor ME

How can you help your leader get better at his/her job?

Have you ever been asked that question? If you have been, and if you made suggestions, were they used? Did the leader in question actually improve his/her craft? Did you help support or coach that person on the journey?

While recent research points to the importance teacher mentoring has on improving instructional practice, what I feel is less often considered is the need for developing high-quality administrators. How many of our leaders have a mentor, a coach, or another active way to be supported in their growth?

Four years ago, as an instructional coach, it was my job to respond to and help teachers improve their practice. Sometimes my efforts were mandated. However, many, many more times my work with teachers was desired. They wanted to get better, appreciated the support, and were willing to learn.

The funny thing about that time in my life was that there was never a coach for me. I wasn’t getting feedback on my craft. I didn’t receive much training. I wanted it, but there was not a model in my school. I fell into that void where counselors, librarians and sometimes other leaders fall where feedback is often less frequent and hardly ever followed up with coaching.

What I got, I had to go get. So, Mr. Kindle, Mrs. Twitter, and various blogs became my central teachers.

Currently, as an administrator, I still have to find the time to sharpen my own saw. While on-the-job training is part of being an administrator, it shouldn’t be confused with real training. For myself and others, I know, beginning your admin career is more often a “trial by fire” (on a daily basis). Not a learning cycle where you decide what you want to work on, practice it, and get feedback.

Part of the problem is time. Administrators struggle to fit it all in, just like the rest of the folks in our organizations. Believe me, if I had to choose between my own PD and providing it to others through observations, facilitation work or even leading sessions, I feel duty-bound to support rather than receive.

Another is about perception. Although we often say we are schools where everyone is learning, it is another thing entirely for the leaders of a school to be accepted as, not having the skills or answers- but learning them. Many aren’t comfortable saying they don’t know how to do something, because saying it might cause others to wonder about their ability to lead.

The last issue is our lack of a network. I’m one of those people whose career is internationally grounded. I grew up (literally and professionally) over here- in our schools. I have never benefited from a “district office” or a cohort of comrades who I’ve been able to move with, together, through a school system since our early teaching years. The network I do have isn’t necessarily HERE.  My feedback angels are not easy to collect together because they are in different countries and at different schools. I can’t utilize them as a sounding board for a problem I’m facing or to ask them to watch and comment on how I’m running a meeting or communicating with staff or parents.

So, here is what I’m looking for- from you. From us.

Can we use technology to expand our feedback network across schools? Can we make time at regional conferences for case studies of current principal and administrative practice. Can we come together within our buildings, to find ways to gather feedback for our administrators, and then follow it up with active coaching?

Can we find the courage to ask for and receive quality feedback (not simply an anonymous survey at the end of year) and make the time to support every learner- even our leaders-  get better?

Photo Credit: http://beyouonlybetter.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/mentor-corkboard.jpg