Tag Archives: AI in education

What Peloton Continues to Teach Me About Learning

Proud of my punctuality, I find it a little embarrassing to admit that I arrived at the party more than a decade late. The fitness company, Peloton, launched a Kickstarter campaign in 2013 to help fund its first internet-connected stationary bike, which officially shipped to early backers later that year. A cyclist, I likely rode my bike thousands of miles before ever really even knowing anything about Peloton. I faintly remember hearing how the company was a pandemic “darling,” and a few friends had Pelotons. But, if I envisioned the bike in our house, it was likely to be just another place to hang a wet towel. However, everything changed this past summer when my wife ordered a Peloton. 

A Beginner Again

Big into being outdoors and having my bicycle roll from point A to B, I would not have believed how I began to feel myself gravitate towards the stationary bike. There was also the notion of having a coach and being challenged by a trainer. In the past, this definitely was not my thing. Though an experienced cyclist, I felt like a beginner again.  And there was satisfaction not only in seeing my numbers improve, but by how I began to feel. Admittedly I quickly began to be addicted to Peloton. Now, more than a hundred workouts into the “party,” I think I know why I am a convert. My passion for the bike and all things Peloton Yoga and Stretch, is connected to my desire to learn. Sure, I knew how to ride a bike but a whole new world has seemingly opened. One where exercise and learning synonymously thrive because there is measurability, constant challenge, varied workouts, and personalization. Not to mention convenience and safety.

“Could I begin to replicate this in my classroom?” I began to wonder.

Being a “student” again has resulted in an interest in fitness progress. I am having to do “the work.” Interval training, endurance rides, and a periodic test called a functional Threshold Power test (FTP). This hard 20-minute ride measures the maximum average power you can maintain. Peloton multiplies your 20-minute average output by 95% to set your personalized 7-zone training metrics on the bike. My FTP results are used to establish personalized power zones that guide the intensity of subsequent rides. Instead of guessing how hard to push, I have numbers on the screen to help me gauge my effort. I have a starting point. The work is still mine. 

Bringing It Into the Classroom

In the classroom, I find myself planning with greater intention. Opportunities for repetition, feedback, and assessments synonymous to the FTP. Students drafted formal proposals for their senior capstone projects and received feedback. Second drafts were then reviewed by colleagues for another round of feedback, before a final draft was submitted. I also am considering the role of variety in the classroom and changing it up for students. Most recently, energy levels soared after playing a silly game called, “Happy Salmon.” This allows for freshness. Yet, inside and outside the classroom I continue to brush up again what appears to be a greater societal pressure. The desire to know. 

Good learning environments give us enough structure to make progress and enough uncertainty to keep growing. Yet, counter to this process approach, there increasingly is a desire to know. To get the answer, any answer. And discomfort with uncertainty appears to be feeding into heightened incidences of anxiety. Not a standalone psychiatric diagnosis, intolerance of uncertainty (IU) is a well-studied psychological trait. I wonder whether our growing access to immediate answers is changing our relationship with uncertainty. A 2026 preprint examining data from 33,864 young adults in U.S. and Canadian college samples reported an increase in intolerance-of-uncertainty scores between 1992 and 2022. The findings do not explain why the scores increased, but they have me thinking about how uncomfortable we seem to have become with not knowing. First it was a fixation on, “What time is it?” A watch attached to our wrist, a clock or three, always within eyeshot. Then, we moved into Googling everything. Now, we find ourselves turning to chatbots to settle questions that, not so long ago, we might have sat with. Or, we may even have shared discourse about. Instead, we are compelled by instant answers. Not to discount the value of chatbots, but I remain curious of what might be happening between our two ears and between us as people. When wonder becomes something to eliminate. There also is the moral question and what it might mean to simply cut out the friction. Are we depriving students of productive struggle? My Peloton workouts certainly do not allow for this!

Stronger Than You Think

Maybe what we need is to recover our willingness to be beginners. To embrace not knowing. This may also be a hidden joy behind my love for Peloton. Aside from the metrics and push for greater performance I am actually enjoying the challenge. The larger question being, how can I improve? Never fully knowing. And not only being okay with this but motivated by it. One of the trainers I keep taking classes from, has a few catchphrases. One is, “You are stronger than you think you are.” I am finding this to be the case. Conceptually it also is surfacing in my teaching. Believing in students more than they likely do themselves. A few years under my belt, I know the greatness which they are capable of. If I might inspire them to believe and then realize this for themselves!

Let Them Decide

Another phrase from this same Peloton trainer is, “I make suggestions, you make decisions.” Teachers are no strangers to decision-making. In an article titled, “Decisions, decisions: Why do teachers feel time poor?” evidence is shared from a 2025 research report involving 138 teachers. 30-minute periods were used as a sample, and the average amount of decisions made in this period fell in the 21–30 range. Prior to this, the daily estimated amount of decisions was 1,500. Could it be that technology is answering more questions? Or maybe more importantly, a technology-rich classroom might reduce the teacher’s need to decide what comes next while increasing the importance of deciding why it matters, whether it is working, and what the student needs as a human being. Regardless, the profession is one wrought by decision-making. I have begun to ask myself which decisions I really need to make for students and which I can return to them. Borrowing my Peloton trainer’s phrase: “I make suggestions, you make decisions,” reminds me that teaching is not about making every choice for students. It is about providing the guidance and conditions that help them make better choices themselves. An 18-year-old asking permission to use the restroom is one small example. Rather than make that decision for the student, I can establish expectations and let the student exercise judgment. 

What if we begin to frame uncertainty as opportunity, instead of problem. Then maybe there is more excitement and less anxiety. This “possibility” is what I feel at the start of every workout. A “promise,” of  future growth or success, and where the learning begins! 

#####################

Education Still Has Time to Choose Humanity in an Age of AI

Surely I am not the only educator who is tired of watching lipstick being put on pig after pig. Apparent improvements on the surface without really addressing what is required. Intentions and measures taken to raise test scores, create policies around AI usage, and nail down portraits of graduates.  Each might appear successful but ignores the deeper issues.  I only trust 2026 will result in letting the pig be a pig. This possibly requires discomfort as we remove the veneer, are more honest, and see things for what they are. Notably also, for where we currently stand. Then, and only then, might we address what truly is priority. Seemingly, I consistently keep coming back to the power of slowing down. Society is not becoming any less rushed or distracted, so we must learn to consciously do this, slow down. AI this. AI that. Everywhere we turn, AI. Important it clearly is, however it is imperative we gather our thoughts and our selves. Reflecting on what matters most, so as to protect the very human values that make us who we are.

When Outsourced Systems Stop Seeing People

Over the holidays, several hours passed me by as I tried to fix a holiday flight issue. The “support” I received was outsourced and scripted. My frustration mounted as a result of loud background noise at a busy foreign call center. I could barely hear or understand. At times I questioned if I was even communicating with a human. With each phone call, chat, and e-mail, my sense of helplessness left me feeling like I was free falling into an abyss. What contributed most to this, was that it did not appear that anyone was truly  listening or moreover, willing to take ownership.

At one point I surprised myself with the nerve to ask, “Who is responsible here?” Only to be met with, “I don’t understand sir.”

“Uggh!” Not one to give up, I trudged on.

A reader may wonder what this has to do with education. Everything!

Efficiency at What Cost?

Just as no company can outsource responsibility without losing trust, schools cannot outsource learning or human connection without losing purpose. A similar frustration I felt shows up in classrooms and throughout the current decaying education system. The quest for efficiency, blended with AI tools may accelerate the “knowledge” economy but, such automation may just be racing us further apart as humans. Einstein warned, “It has become appallingly obvious that our technology has exceeded our humanity.”  Specifically, he was concerned that ethics were lagging behind as weapons had become powerful enough to destroy humanity. AI is the “weapon” at our doorstep in 2026. More than two and a half years ago, professor Ethan Mollick shared with McKinsey Global Institute imparted AI wasn’t a future threat but was already reshaping the world of work and learning. A tremendous amount has happened in the last couple years. For comparison, the number of transistors on a CPU (computer chip) is said to follow Moore’s Law, doubling roughly every 18–24 months. This led to computers becoming exponentially faster, smaller, and more powerful over time. Until recently, Moore’s Law was haunting growth. AI scaling however, is traveling even faster, doubling in capability in 6-12 months! Such breakneck speed requires even more consideration of and for ethics. Anthropic, an AI research company and public benefit corporation focused on building safe, reliable, and helpful AI systems, is best known for its Claude family of large language models (LLMs). In an article titled, Anthropic’s “Soul Overview” for Claude Has Leaked, Anthropic revealed how they “want Claude to support human oversight of AI,” and to “behave ethically” and “genuinely helpful to operators and users.” So, whilst companies train AI to be ethical, we each may be wise to not give up our own governorship, deciding for ourselves when AI truly helps us instead of just making things faster. 

Human Needs in an Age of AI

To know our needs is critical. Students, teachers, schools, businesses, and all society at large. In an Education Week article titled, “Rising Use of AI in Schools Comes With Big Downsides for Students,” AI is reported to have a negative impact on student to teacher relationships and peer-to-peer connections. Furthermore, the authors cite a report by the nonprofit Center for Democracy and Technology in which “seventy percent of teachers worry that AI weakens critical thinking and research skills.” AI is and will only continue to have an enormous impact on how we are learning. And yes, we, similar to all species, need to adapt. Yet, our human needs are far more stable.  Thus, knowing our needs is critical. So, what exactly is it that we need?

1. Connection: Students need to feel seen, heard, and understood by real people.Funs Jacobs points to human connection as the answer of what will become more valuable when intelligence becomes a commodity? For more, see:Human connection will thrive in an AGI world

2. Belonging: Learning happens best in environments where students feel safe and included.Global Online Academy (GOA) serves students, teachers, and leaders and is comprised of member schools from around the world, including independent, international, charter, and public schools. For more about how they are addressing belonging, see: Belonging Beyond the Bell

3. Meaning: Students need learning to connect to their lives, experiences, and the real world.After more than two decades in the classroom, this is why I teach Capstone and Entrepreneurship. For Getting Smart, purpose means integrating content and skills outcomes with real-world problems and tasks that students find meaningful. For more, see:The Importance of Purpose-Based Learning in K-12 Education

4. Challenge: Growth requires struggle, thinking, and problem-solving. Process and not just answers.Gallup reported in 2024, “Less Than Half of Gen Z K-12 Students Say Their Coursework Challenges Them or Gives Them the Opportunity to Do What They Do Best.” For more, see: K-12 Schools Struggle to Engage Gen Z Students 

5. Responsibility: Students must develop agency and have an opportunity to not just collect knowledge, but be able to do. This includes ethically using tools, including AI.Yong Zhao said it best in a recent visit to The Knox School, “Learning, is no longer about collecting information. It’s about doing. And in this co-evolving relationship between humans and machines, we must teach students to think critically, act ethically and create value…The goal of education is simple: help every child find their unique greatness. They won’t know what it is until they try. But give them space, support and the chance to fail fast – and they’ll discover it.”

The Cost of Chasing Outcomes

Tis’ the season for grade 12 students to hear from universities on their admittance. The push into these schools is often IB curriculum and AP classes. This is not to be a slam of either curriculum, and yet both receive critiques of how pedagogy is often bent on an overemphasis on structure, compliance, and formulaic inquiry. For students and educators alike there may even be burnout. What runs the risk of getting lost is what truly matters most: knowing students as people, creating space for thinking, academic struggle and responding to the moment, rather than the “checklist.” Or, even the feeling that the ends could ever justify the means. The 5 on an AP exam, the college essay, or even an acceptance letter is hardly “an end.” And the means?  Regardless of school or curriculum, many students are utilizing AI in responsible ways. Yet, shortcuts are common as students push towards a perceived illusory finish line. Automating their learning shortchanges them of the very purpose, learning. All the while, increasing the demand for “real” connection.

A Vote for Humanity

Some are predicting 2026 to be a year in which low-tech (maybe even no tech?) instruction will rebound. Balance is what I hope for. Absolutely, mastery of how to use AI is an essential skill for K12 grads and beyond. And yet so are seminars and oral defenses. Consciousness and intent are critical if we are to ensure that technology does not exceed our humanity. This nexus we are living amidst is exhilarating, inspiring, and frightful. It may even feel like a burden to bear. Yet, what may be our greatest fortune is that we have not crossed over yet. We still have a choice. Education that chooses humanity helps students connect, belong, find meaning, embrace challenge, and take ownership of their learning. 

Make a vote for humanity. I am. 

#########################