Tag Archives: instructional supervision

Lianne Dominguez

Helping Teachers Flourish: The Heart of School Leadership

Leave a comment

This summer, I had the privilege of teaching and learning alongside almost a hundred teachers and school leaders through two back-to-back courses on instructional supervision and evaluation.

They represented different schools, systems, countries, and stages of leadership. Yet despite their diverse contexts, I was struck by how quickly our conversations converged.

The questions they asked were not just about observations, evaluation rubrics, or instructional frameworks themselves. Instead, they revealed something much deeper.

How do we create schools where teachers continue to grow, so that every student has the opportunity to flourish?

That question stayed with me long after the courses ended because it challenged me to think more deeply about what it really means for a school community to flourish.

We often talk about student flourishing, but perhaps we don’t spend enough time reflecting on what flourishing really means.

To flourish is more than to achieve success.

It is to continue growing.

To be challenged while feeling supported.

To develop confidence through purposeful practice.

To find meaning in what we do.

To belong to a community that believes we can always become better than we were yesterday.

If this is what we hope for our students, shouldn’t it also be what we hope for our teachers?

Teachers do not and should not stop learning the day they enter the profession. Like every professional, they deserve opportunities to reflect on their practice, receive meaningful feedback, refine their craft, and continue growing throughout their careers.

Perhaps this is where our work as school leaders matters most.

Our influence on student learning is rarely direct; it is multiplied through the teachers we support every day.

Throughout the courses, these conversations surfaced again and again through questions like:

  • How do we make classroom observations meaningful?
  • How do we ensure feedback leads to growth rather than compliance?
  • How do we balance operational demands with instructional leadership?

As I reflected afterwards, I realised they were all pointing towards the same question:

What conditions help teachers grow?

Four conditions kept emerging.

  • Clarity – Leaders create clarity by establishing a shared understanding of excellent teaching.
  • Trust – Leaders create trust by making coaching the purpose of supervision.
  • Evidence – Leaders strengthen professional judgment by grounding feedback in evidence.
  • Time – Leaders create the possibility for growth by intentionally protecting time.

Each of these matters on its own, but together they create the conditions in which teachers can continue to learn, refine their practice, and flourish.

Clarity

Teachers deserve a shared understanding of what excellent teaching looks like – not as a checklist to comply with, but as a framework grounded in research and the science of learning. Shared standards create a common language for professional growth and ensure that our feedback is anchored in evidence rather than individual preference.

Trust

Professional growth happens when supervision becomes a coaching conversation rather than a performance exercise. Teachers are far more likely to reflect honestly, take instructional risks, and refine their practice when they know the purpose of feedback is growth, not judgment.

Evidence

Professional judgment should be informed by patterns of practice and their impact on student learning and not isolated observations or personal preference. Evidence collected over time allows us to make thoughtful decisions about how best to support each teacher’s continued growth.

Time

Perhaps this is the condition we talk about least, yet it may be the one that determines whether all the others are possible.

Time to be present in classrooms.

Time to notice.

Time to listen before we speak.

Time to ask questions that provoke reflection rather than simply provide answers.

Time to coach.

Time to celebrate growth.

Time to learn alongside our teachers.

As another school year begins, I find myself returning to one simple truth: leadership is measured not only by the people we help grow, but by what we intentionally make time for.

After all, our calendars are often the clearest reflection of what we truly value.

Perhaps flourishing schools do not begin with programmes, initiatives, or strategic plans.

Perhaps they begin with leaders who intentionally create the conditions in which teachers continue to flourish.

So, as I prepare for the year ahead, I find myself returning to one simple question: What will I intentionally protect this year so that my teachers have the greatest opportunity to flourish?

Lianne Dominguez

From the (Virtual) Room: Instructional Supervision Trends We Can’t Ignore

2 Comments

While most educators were taking a well-earned summer pause, a cohort of school leaders and instructional coaches from across the globe chose something different: to sit in a virtual room, for seven days, to confront the messy, emotional, and often misunderstood world of instructional supervision and evaluation.

I had the privilege of co-facilitating the Instructional Supervision and Evaluation course at the Principals’ Training Center this July, and something about this particular cohort stayed with me. It wasn’t just their commitment—it was the quiet clarity they brought. They didn’t come just to learn a framework. They came with thoughtful problems of practice, patterns they’d been noticing, and a genuine belief that the systems they were leading—or working within—could do better. And more importantly, they came ready to take action.

Common Themes that Emerged : What We’re Really Trying to Fix

One of the things I’ve always appreciated about PTC courses is the emphasis on application tasks—practical, school-based projects or change initiatives that participants design during the week to bring back and implement in their own contexts.

As I reviewed the change initiatives—the diversity of contexts was striking. But what was even more powerful were the common themes that kept showing up, regardless of country, role, or school size —clear signals that leaders across the world are wrestling with similar challenges and reaching toward a more human, meaningful version of instructional supervision.

With over 57 school leaders representing 54 schools across 48 countries, these patterns are more than just coincidence—they suggest emerging global trends in how we think about instructional supervision. In research terms, this may not be a formal sample, but it certainly reflects a meaningful, practitioner-led pulse across international schools.

Here’s what we’re seeing:

  • Humanizing the Process: Leaders are moving away from high-stakes, formal observations toward mini observations and peer feedback—making growth more regular, more relational, and less performative.
  • Trust as a Starting Point: Many named trust as the first thing they need to build—before any framework, rubric, or policy can take root.
  • Alignment to mission and values: More leaders are realizing that when supervision doesn’t reflect school values, student learning outcomes, or professional standards, it feels hollow. Coherence matters.
  • Empowering Teacher Voice: Supervision isn’t one-way. Educators are co-constructing rubrics, initiating peer learning walks, and asking for differentiated pathways to support their growth.
  • Using Data as a Mirror: Student learning data is being reframed—not as accountability pressure, but as a reflective tool to guide professional learning conversations.
  • Anchoring to Professional Standards of Practice: Schools are leaning into international standards of practice for teachers—not to control, but to create clarity, shared language, and purpose.

One participant asked: What if we made supervision feel like support instead of surveillance? That question lingered.

Mindsets That Need Rewriting

As an observer and guide throughout the week, I saw a shared readiness and a collective willingness to move beyond what’s always been done and lean into more intentional, human-centered leadership. The mindset shifts were clear—and they echoed across roles, schools, and regions. Here are a few that surfaced again and again:

  • From evaluator to learning partner: Supervisors are trying to sit beside teachers, not above them.
  • From collecting evidence to creating clarity: There’s growing recognition that teachers need to know what to aim for—not just what not to do.
  • From isolated walkthroughs to relational feedback loops: Supervision, when done right, strengthens the professional culture, not just instructional practice.
  • From telling to asking: More leaders are leaning into coaching, pausing, and listening. And that’s where real trust begins.
  • From pedagogy to learning impact: Supervisors are shifting their lens—not just asking what the teacher is doing, but how and what students are learning as a result. The focus is moving from activity to evidence of learning.
  • From single data points to multiple sources of evidence: Supervisors are moving beyond relying on just one observation or test score to determine teaching effectiveness. Instead, they’re drawing from a range of data—student work, learning conversations, peer feedback, and outcomes over time—to build a fuller, more accurate picture of impact.
  • From top-down control to shared responsibility: Schools are beginning to embed supervision into a distributed leadership model, where growth is not held by one person, but shared across teams. When teachers help shape the system, they’re more invested in the outcomes—and supervision becomes a collective commitment, not just a managerial task.

Patterns I’ll Be Taking With Me

In between toolkits, frameworks, and standards, what struck me most were the unspoken efforts behind each task: the courage to name what’s broken, the willingness to build something new, and the quiet acknowledgment that instructional supervision is emotional labor—both for the teacher and the leader.

Too often, supervision is mistaken for a tool to fix teachers. But what if its real purpose is to free them? Free them from ambiguity. Free them from fear. Free them from feedback that feels more like judgment than growth.

In that sense, every person in our cohort wasn’t just designing a new system. They were trying to write a new story for their school—one where professional growth is seen as a shared act of care.

The Responsibility of Facilitating This Work

Facilitating this course comes with responsibility. It means holding space for hard questions. It means not pushing a one-size-fits-all model, but helping leaders find what works in their context, for their teachers, in service of their students. And it means reminding all of us—myself included—that supervision is not just a checklist we tick off but it’s a culture we build.

Even in the heat of July, there are leaders out there choosing to rethink what growth can look like. Choosing learning. Choosing clarity. Choosing trust.

And honestly? That gives me hope.

What About You?

What will instructional supervision mean in your school next year?

What are you walking past—and what are you walking toward?